Monday 27 October 2014

A Taxpayer’s Guide to Terrorism



A Taxpayer’s Guide to Terrorism

Chris Coverdale, a peace campaigner, highlights the astonishing implications for
taxpayers of a legal ruling by the UK Supreme Court on the definition of terrorism

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Terrorism is the threat or use of firearms or explosives endangering a person’s life for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.                                                                                                                 
Section 1 Terrorism Act 2000

Historic legal ruling

An extraordinary event occurred recently which could end Britain’s involvement in war.  In a remarkable legal judgement[1] on the definition of terrorism in the Terrorism Act 2000 the UK Supreme Court ruled that the military activities of the British Government are terrorism:

“the legislation does not exempt, nor make an exception, nor create a defence for, nor exculpate what some would describe as terrorism in a just cause. Such a concept is foreign to the 2000 Act. Terrorism is terrorism, whatever the motives of the perpetrators. … 

Terrorist action outside the United Kingdom which involves the use of firearms or explosives, resulting in danger to life or creating a serious risk to the health or safety to the public in that country, or involving (not producing) serious personal violence or damage to property, or designed seriously to interfere with an electronic system, ‘is terrorism’...

the definition would seem to cover any violence or damage to property if it is carried out with a view to influencing a government or IGO in order to advance a very wide range of causes.  Thus it would appear to extend to military or quasi-military activity aimed at bringing down a foreign government, even where that activity is approved (officially or unofficially) by the UK Government.”

Britain’s military actions in Iraq and Afghanistan are unequivocally illegal

This definitive decision implies that the wars and military activities of the UK Government since 2001 in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, each of which was aimed at bringing down a foreign government, are terrorism and as such are illegal.   

Not only does it mean that all uses of firearms and explosives in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria by members of HM Forces are illegal and therefore must cease immediately, but it also means that any UK resident who does not end their participation in the wars and armed conflicts authorised by HM Government since 2001, wilfully commits serious crimes and is criminally liable for the consequences of their support for military action.
Paying tax is a crime when the money is used for the purposes of terrorism

When Parliament enacted the Terrorism Act 2000 it made it a criminal offence for a person to demand, collect or pay money for the purposes of terrorism. 

15. Fund-raising.

(1) A person commits an offence if he invites another to provide money or other property, and intends that it should be used, or has reasonable cause to suspect that it may be used, for the purposes of terrorism.

(2 ) A person commits an offence if he receives money or other property, and intends that it should be used, or has reasonable cause to suspect that it may be used, for the purposes of terrorism.

(3) A person commits an offence if he provides money or other property, and knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that it will or may be used for the purposes of terrorism.

Taxpayers’ duty to withhold tax

Now that the Supreme Court has ruled that the military activities of the UK Government are terrorism it follows that all taxpayers in Britain, in order to uphold the Terrorism Act, must withhold all tax payments from the Government and its agents (HMR&C, Councils, Businesses, Institutions etc) until the wars have ended, HM Forces have been recalled, criminal proceedings against those responsible for war crimes have begun, and a court has ruled that the Government is acting in accord with the UN Declaration on Principles of International Law 1970.

Employees’ duty to report employers to police

Another extraordinary implication of the ruling is that employees now have a legal duty under section 19 of the Terrorism Act 2000 to report to the police anyone that they know or suspect is demanding, collecting or paying money (tax) to the Government.

19. Disclosure of information: duty.

(1)  This section applies where a person believes or suspects that another person has committed an offence under any of sections 15 to 18, and bases his belief or suspicion on information which comes to his attention in the course of a trade, profession or business, or in the course of his employment…

(2)  The person commits an offence if he does not disclose to a constable as soon as is reasonably practicable his belief or suspicion, and the information on which it is based. …

This means that if you know that your employer is making payments (PAYE, NI, VAT, Corporation tax etc) to HM Government you have a legal duty to report him or her to the police, and if you fail to do so you commit an imprisonable offence.    So start reporting employers to the Police now. 

Chris Coverdale                       Make Wars History                         October 2014


[1] Regina ‘v’ Gul UKSC 64 (2013) Paragraphs 26 and 28

Why have no UK war criminals been arrested?
http://youtu.be/zjMHf5hVVEg
Why is the law not being upheld?
http://youtu.be/wu4ApKmoP4E
So much more than an idea.
Contact Unions together? Would that be a move in the right direction?
http://www.unionstogether.org.uk/pages/contact

Friday 21 February 2014

We have to deal with the immediate crisis; ARREST GOVERNMENT

So what is it to be, a bunch of war criminals and murderers avoiding prosecution, or a police force that isn't enforcing the law? 

Step 1. Enforce the law. 

Step 2. Arrest 559 MP's. 

Step 3 hold brand new elections without having to choose one murderer from another. 


The policeman in the street should step up before they themselves become further embroiled fodder in a trough of lies and deceit https://www.facebook.com/events/440279219412454/?ref_dashboard_filter=upcoming



We have to deal with the immediate crisis

Our Country, its People & its principles of common decency have been hijacked by the corrupt, the unscrupulouse and the immoral.
They must be arrested and shut down
The law must serve and be seen to serve both  purpose and People.
If the law of the land will not be honoured and upheld by those who have sworn oath and allegence to it, the land & People, then it is unfit for purpose then it is devoid of substance and there can only be one action, that of non compliance.





 ARREST GOVERNMENT


























Calling on all who are of conscience to enforce the law.

Murder is always a crime, and the murder of children is the most heinous of crimes. There comes a time when women and men must align themselves to correct action and moral fortitude and persistence for truth & justice.

The message is to stop violence not to promote it.

There has been much deliberation with UK police regarding the law and UK war criminals. International laws and treaties have been quoted, but to date have failed to be recognised by the UK police.

Here is the law as set down in the UK

The offences against Person Act 1861

(4) "Whosoever shall solicit, encourage, persuade or endeavor to persuade, or shall propose to any person, to murder any other person, whether he( or she) be a subject of Her Majesty or not, and whether he (she) be within the Queens dominions or not, shall be guilty of an offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to imprisonment for life". http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/100/section/4

The guilty; Vote count by MP’s of the UK government participation in the air strikes on Libya; 557 MPs rallied behind David Cameron's new military adventure, while only 15 MPs opposed it (13 votes against, plus 2 'tellers').

These MP’s who voted in favor of air strikes in Libya, knew full well that they would result in the deaths of children, women and men. This was and still is murder. A list of MP’s who voted in favour of air strikes on Libya is available to police on request.

Murder or manslaughter abroad.

(9) Where any murder or manslaughter shall be committed on land out of the United Kingdom, whether within the Queen’s dominions or without, and whether the person killed were a subject of Her Majesty or not, every offence committed by any subject of Her Majesty in respect of any such case, whether the same shall amount to the offence of murder or of manslaughter, may be dealt with, inquired of, tried, determined, and punished in England or Ireland. Provided, that nothing herein contained shall prevent any person from being tried in any place out of England or Ireland for any murder or manslaughter committed out of England or Ireland, in the same manner as such person might have been tried before the passing of this Act.

Elements of Arrest under section 24 PACE

A lawful arrest requires two elements:

1. A person’s involvement or suspected involvement or attempted involvement in the commission of a criminal offence;

AND

2. Reasonable grounds for believing that the person’s arrest is necessary.


The Rome statute of the International criminal court 1998;

Article 27, (1) This statute shall apply equally to all persons without any distinction based on official capacity. In particular, official capacity as head of state or government, a member of a government or parliament, an elected representative or a government official shall in no case exempt a person from criminal responsibility under this statute, nor shall it, in and of itself, constitute a ground for reduction of sentence. (2) Immunities or special procedural rules which may attach to the official capacity of a person, whether under national or international law, shall not bar the court from exercising its jurisdiction over such a person.

By Oath in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law. Please take note that this is not a political issue but one of law.

If you are a Policeman, judge or any other law enforcement officer or official 
you are advised to take direct action, you are also advised to pay particular notice and attention to the following;

Nuremberg Principle IV states, “The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.”http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/full/390

Also take note of the Rome statute of the International criminal court 1998; Article 27, (1) http://untreaty.un.org/cod/icc/statute/99_corr/cstatute.htm

Monday 6 January 2014

We need you to be active, in this action

We need you to be active, in this action

Print out the following and hand it directly to any and all law enforcement officers. Calling on all who are of conscience to enforce the law.

Murder is always a crime, and the murder of children is the most heinous of crimes. There comes a time when women and men must align themselves to correct action and moral fortitude and persistence for truth & justice.

The message is to stop violence not to promote it.

There has been much deliberation with UK police regarding the law and UK war criminals. International laws and treaties have been quoted, but to date have failed to be recognised by the UK police.

Here is the law as set down in the UK

The offences against Person Act 1861

(4) "Whosoever shall solicit, encourage, persuade or endeavor to persuade, or shall propose to any person, to murder any other person, whether he( or she) be a subject of Her Majesty or not, and whether he (she) be within the Queens dominions or not, shall be guilty of an offence, and being convicted thereof shall be liable to imprisonment for life". http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/100/section/4

The guilty; Vote count by MP’s of the UK government participation in the air strikes on Libya; 557 MPs rallied behind David Cameron's new military adventure, while only 15 MPs opposed it (13 votes against, plus 2 'tellers').

These MP’s who voted in favor of air strikes in Libya, knew full well that they would result in the deaths of children, women and men. This was and still is murder. A list of MP’s who voted in favour of air strikes on Libya is available to police on request.

Murder or manslaughter abroad.

(9) Where any murder or manslaughter shall be committed on land out of the United Kingdom, whether within the Queen’s dominions or without, and whether the person killed were a subject of Her Majesty or not, every offence committed by any subject of Her Majesty in respect of any such case, whether the same shall amount to the offence of murder or of manslaughter, may be dealt with, inquired of, tried, determined, and punished in England or Ireland. Provided, that nothing herein contained shall prevent any person from being tried in any place out of England or Ireland for any murder or manslaughter committed out of England or Ireland, in the same manner as such person might have been tried before the passing of this Act.

Elements of Arrest under section 24 PACE

A lawful arrest requires two elements:

1. A person’s involvement or suspected involvement or attempted involvement in the commission of a criminal offence;

AND

2. Reasonable grounds for believing that the person’s arrest is necessary.

Under International Law http://untreaty.un.org/cod/icc/statute/99_corr/cstatute.htm

The Rome statute of the International criminal court 1998;

Article 27, (1) This statute shall apply equally to all persons without any distinction based on official capacity. In particular, official capacity as head of state or government, a member of a government or parliament, an elected representative or a government official shall in no case exempt a person from criminal responsibility under this statute, nor shall it, in and of itself, constitute a ground for reduction of sentence. (2) Immunities or special procedural rules which may attach to the official capacity of a person, whether under national or international law, shall not bar the court from exercising its jurisdiction over such a person.

By Oath in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law. Please take note that this is not a political issue but one of law.

If you are a Policeman, judge or any other law enforcement officer or official you are advised to take action, you are also advised to pay particular notice and attention to the following;

Nuremberg Principle IV states, “The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.” http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/full/390


The truth must be addressed